More
than 70 people attended a successful, informative and emotional Side Event at
COP 7 in Geneva
Testimonials
and Dialogue
The ROCA/WECF Side event “Chrysotile Asbestos and the question: Who pays the Bill?” with its testimonials of victims who suffer from lifelong health effects from the exposure to chrysotile asbestos showed once more the urgent need to listing chrysotile asbestos to Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention. The event, attended by more than 70 people, was a real contrast to the numerous interventions of Parties in the morning plenary of COP7, opposing the listing of chrysotile asbestos by disseminating the claim that they are not aware of any health impacts resulting from the exposure to asbestos.
The panel of speakers consisted of Tran Tuan from the
Vietnam Research and Training Centre for Community development, South Korean
activist and researcher Yeyong Choi, and Sanjiv Pandita from the Asia Monitor
Resource Center. The presentation of Tran Tuan pointed out that action by Civil
Society could move things forward in a positive way and very fast, like the
Vietnam example is showing. Yeyong Choi delivered insights on how the asbestos
industry shifts their production to countries with less strict regulation, and
this effects workers and residents in the factories neighborhood. Sanjiv
Pandita pointed out how important objective medical investigations are to make
sure asbestos related diseases like cancer, asbestosis get know as this.
The side event was organized by the Rotterdam Convention Alliance (ROCA) and
was facilitated by Women in Europe for a
Common Future (WECF). The WECF's Johanna Hausmann chaired the session, a taxing
job not made any easier by the boorish behaviour of Russian Chrysotile trade
Union representatives who tried to interrupt the proceedings on more than one
occasion. They accused WHO being a propaganda organization due to the fact WHO
is supporting movies such as the one screened in the side event which shows the
real impacts of chrysotile asbestos.
The panelists and many speakers from the plenary, such as representatives from WHO, ILO, victim action networks, trade unions etc. attending the side event were in agreement regarding the crucial importance of listing chrysotile asbestos on Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention; they called on delegates to make every effort to resolve the current impasse over chrysotile in order to protect human health.
The panelists and many speakers from the plenary, such as representatives from WHO, ILO, victim action networks, trade unions etc. attending the side event were in agreement regarding the crucial importance of listing chrysotile asbestos on Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention; they called on delegates to make every effort to resolve the current impasse over chrysotile in order to protect human health.
I am very amazed by the information of this blog and i am glad that i had a look over the blog.
ReplyDeleteasbestos
Wonderful blog! I truly love how it’s easy on my eyes as well as the info are well written.
ReplyDeleteAsbestos Removal in Southampton
The workers should be protected from asbestos exposure. Employers should take help from asbestos removal contractors to abate this harm.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your guidance and support. Thank you for providing such a valuable information. Thank you for being such an inspiration to me and others around you.
ReplyDelete